Message boards :
News :
New experiment in RakeSearch
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 103 Credit: 1,973,929 RAC: 15 |
Dear all, We are excited to announce the return of RakeSearch! Long-term collaboration with our colleagues from other Russian cities and the vast space of unsolved combinatorial problems have given us new challenges to be solved. The first challenge is to beat the current record on the number of transversals for DLSs of order 12. We already have tasks for the next 2 months, and there will be more. Technically, we have moved the project to the new hardware server and updated the BOINC server software. We hope that this new setting will bring you a good experience! With best wishes, Natalia and hoarfrost |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Some workunits from first bunch of ~170 items may fail with an error. We changed the attributes of workunits and expect that new tasks for same workunits will compute successfully. |
Send message Joined: 5 Nov 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 6,772 RAC: 21 |
Hi all, I've tried some work units so far. Is 3 seconds per workunit the average time ? I've had some compute error as well. The workunit going to 100% in a dozen of seconds then failed after 5 minutes. Just a report of what I've observed so far :) Best regards, micropro |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Hello, micropro! Tasks run time varies from several seconds to several hours. Another small bunch of tasks added! |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 18 Posts: 2 Credit: 293,621,359 RAC: 32,134 |
So this is a Windows only project now? |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Hello stoneageman! Only for Windows version of this application available at this moment. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 17 Posts: 42 Credit: 18,056,025 RAC: 4,178 |
Even though the server status page shows ODLS 10 Wus available (and apparently being crunched by others), all I'm getting are beta WUs, which complete in 5-10 seconds. I have the application enabled in my preferences. Is the server page not keeping up with things :). (3 minutes later) NVM. getting WUs now. that was weird. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 17 Posts: 42 Credit: 18,056,025 RAC: 4,178 |
Hope you're going to keep awarding the cool badges for the new project. :) |
Send message Joined: 27 Apr 18 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,003,073 RAC: 192 |
lets start crunching :) |
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 18 Posts: 10 Credit: 701,581 RAC: 242 |
My first task shows completed successfully but the Task detail throws and error at the beginning.... Error: startup_info.hStdInput is invalid. See below <core_client_version>7.16.20</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> 20:30:36 (29116): wrapper (7.9.26016): starting 20:30:36 (29116): wrapper: running rake_odls12_windows_intelx86_64.exe () Error: startup_info.hStdInput is invalid 11/5/2021 8:30:45 PM Resources freeing: XmlReader 11/5/2021 8:30:45 PM Spstarter finished successfully 20:30:46 (29116): rake_odls12_windows_intelx86_64.exe exited; CPU time 0.000000 20:30:46 (29116): called boinc_finish(0) Thanks Bill F |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 17 Posts: 42 Credit: 18,056,025 RAC: 4,178 |
I have 40 WUs that errored out and all were longer running tasks (~12,000 sec). Just saying. |
Send message Joined: 7 Dec 17 Posts: 7 Credit: 716,455 RAC: 47 |
The run time for these results are all over the place. Most runs only seconds, others run long and some error out for running to long. I think some settings need to be looked at. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 17 Posts: 42 Credit: 18,056,025 RAC: 4,178 |
+1 |
Send message Joined: 25 Jan 19 Posts: 11 Credit: 394,328 RAC: 32 |
Will there be checkpoints when crunching new tasks? |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Thank you for report! We have raised the border 10 times more. |
Send message Joined: 27 Apr 18 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,003,073 RAC: 192 |
too many little writes not good for ssd storage |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Hi folks! Thank you for report! We have raised the border 10 times more. If you have any tasks fallen with and error like "exceeded elapsed time limit" please report about it. Tasks received after my quoted message should not drop out with such an error. |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 645 Credit: 22,459,028 RAC: 12,926 |
Will there be checkpoints when crunching new tasks? Hello! :) Unfortunately, the current application does not make a checkpoints. Thank you for participation! |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 103 Credit: 1,973,929 RAC: 15 |
What for checkpointing, it is problematic to implement checkpoints in this experiment, because the sub-trees on which we perform exhaustive search are very different in sizes. If we do a checkpoint at higher tiers of the tree, it is very likely that 9 of 10 sub-trees will be processed very fast, and the 10th will take several hours, so no sense in a checkpoint. If we go into the recursion 1-2 tiers deeper, the check for need of a checkpoint will be performed too often and increase the whole runtime of a task several-fold. |
Send message Joined: 7 Dec 17 Posts: 7 Credit: 716,455 RAC: 47 |
What for checkpointing, it is problematic to implement checkpoints in this experiment, because the sub-trees on which we perform exhaustive search are very different in sizes. If we do a checkpoint at higher tiers of the tree, it is very likely that 9 of 10 sub-trees will be processed very fast, and the 10th will take several hours, so no sense in a checkpoint. If we go into the recursion 1-2 tiers deeper, the check for need of a checkpoint will be performed too often and increase the whole runtime of a task several-fold. How about using a fixed time interval for a checkpoint trigger with the checkpoint data pointing to the start of whatever calculaton that is happing at that moment? |
©2024 The searchers team, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences