Crunchers poll about Distributed Computing projects

Message boards : News : Crunchers poll about Distributed Computing projects
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
hoarfrost
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 11 Aug 17
Posts: 624
Credit: 20,555,733
RAC: 7,978
Message 626 - Posted: 30 Oct 2018, 20:09:49 UTC
Last modified: 31 Oct 2018, 5:30:32 UTC

Dear participants!

Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences conducts a survey of cruncher's opinions about Distributed Computing projects. Please rate the projects in questionnaire in one of the following languages:

En - Rating of volunteer distributed computing projects
De - Bewertung der Projekte des freiwilligen aufgeteilten Computings
Fr - Évaluation des projets des calculs volontaires fractionnés
Ru - Экспертная оценка проекта Добровольных Распределённых Вычислений

Thank you for attention and opinion!
ID: 626 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005

Send message
Joined: 10 Feb 18
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,857,521
RAC: 20,212
Message 627 - Posted: 1 Nov 2018, 9:33:09 UTC

Good initiative but *please* you have a first page with 9 criteria to rate for the chosen project (Ok...) and next page are the same 9 criteria to rate again with a different notation scale !!! So what, we have to try to "convert" the notation we put in the first page into the 2nd different one ??

This is a nonsense and you are going to loose 90% of the people who made the effort to go for that pool already at this page.

At least, you lost me there, I didn't terminate the pool.
ID: 627 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Michael H.W. Weber
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 17
Posts: 47
Credit: 27,378,776
RAC: 234
Message 628 - Posted: 1 Nov 2018, 11:52:32 UTC - in response to Message 627.  

Unfortunately, the same over here...

Michael.
President of Rechenkraft.net.
Fördern, kooperieren und konstruieren statt fordern, konkurrieren und konsumieren.
ID: 628 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Michael H.W. Weber
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 17
Posts: 47
Credit: 27,378,776
RAC: 234
Message 629 - Posted: 1 Nov 2018, 11:53:53 UTC - in response to Message 627.  

Unfortunately, the same over here...

Michael.
President of Rechenkraft.net.
Fördern, kooperieren und konstruieren statt fordern, konkurrieren und konsumieren.
ID: 629 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hoarfrost
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 11 Aug 17
Posts: 624
Credit: 20,555,733
RAC: 7,978
Message 630 - Posted: 1 Nov 2018, 14:27:00 UTC - in response to Message 627.  
Last modified: 1 Nov 2018, 14:29:38 UTC

Hello Jerome!

Good initiative but *please* you have a first page with 9 criteria to rate for the chosen project (Ok...) and next page are the same 9 criteria to rate again with a different notation scale !!! So what, we have to try to "convert" the notation we put in the first page into the 2nd different one ??

Questions on page 3 are about how good a selected project by several characteristics, but on next page you can indicate weight of this characteristics, by your opinion.
For example, some crunchers may "say" that "Scientific component of the project" is more important than "Design of the project" and set larger weight, but other crunchers - not. :)
ID: 630 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005

Send message
Joined: 10 Feb 18
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,857,521
RAC: 20,212
Message 631 - Posted: 2 Nov 2018, 18:21:30 UTC

OK I understand the idea but I think it's then quite complicated to answer, it would mean I have to write down the answers I made on the first page and rethink them with the other perspective on the other page... at least all should be presented on one single page so I can answer all together ...

Also having 9 levels of answer for each question is not realistic, 3 or 4 should be a maximum.
ID: 631 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hoarfrost
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 11 Aug 17
Posts: 624
Credit: 20,555,733
RAC: 7,978
Message 646 - Posted: 29 Nov 2018, 20:20:13 UTC
Last modified: 30 Nov 2018, 8:32:42 UTC

Hello folks!

After month of poll, colleagues from Institute for Information Transmission Problems summed up the interim results. Figure below shows the averadged opinion about RakeSearch project. May be some funny, but objective!
Also poll was modified - explain smiles added. And the voting continues!

Thank you for attention to project!
ID: 646 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : News : Crunchers poll about Distributed Computing projects

©2024 The searchers team, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences