Computer 15998 CPU vs wingman computers CPUs
Single-thread performance. Comparison by CPU time spent on results: Wingman CPU time / Leading CPU time
| Leading CPU | Best | Average | Worst | Wingman CPU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 0.286 | 0.071 | 0.000 | 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-11320H @ 3.20GHz [Family 6 Model 140 Stepping 2] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 1.000 | 0.329 | 0.000 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor [Family 25 Model 33 Stepping 2] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 0.432 | 0.432 | 0.432 | AMD EPYC 9B14 96-Core Processor [Family 25 Model 17 Stepping 1] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 4.000 | 1.735 | 0.000 | AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 49 Stepping 0] |
Multi-thread computer performance. Comparison by CPU time spent on results and number of threads: (Wingman CPU time / Leading CPU time) * (Leading CPU threads / Wingman CPU threads)
| Leading CPU | Threads | Best | Average | Worst | Threads | Wingman CPU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 12 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 384 | AMD EPYC 9B14 96-Core Processor [Family 25 Model 17 Stepping 1] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 12 | 0.428 | 0.107 | 0.000 | 8 | 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-11320H @ 3.20GHz [Family 6 Model 140 Stepping 2] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 12 | 0.500 | 0.217 | 0.000 | 96 | AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 49 Stepping 0] |
| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz [Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10] | 12 | 1.000 | 0.329 | 0.000 | 12 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor [Family 25 Model 33 Stepping 2] |
©2026 The searchers team, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences