Message boards :
Number crunching :
Short deadline for Spectra of Latin squares
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 19 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,871,753 RAC: 1,481 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On 2 of my slower computers, the computing time to complete a workunit is about 5-7 days, and on both of them, few work units failed with status "Timed out - no response" when they were nearly finished. This is such a waste of time, which could be used for other projects, and that is why this app will not be used on my computers anymore until this problem is resolved. There are other projects which could either calculate the remaining time precisely, and such long work unit will not be started on them, or allow going over the deadline. Rakearch project and this particular app fail in both. |
Send message Joined: 8 Sep 17 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,010,773 RAC: 675 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On 2 of my slower computers, the computing time to complete a workunit is about 5-7 days, and on both of them, few work units failed with status "Timed out - no response" when they were nearly finished. Wu with such long calculation times need a longer cut-off date. |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 678 Credit: 25,667,152 RAC: 18,794 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
... few work units failed with status "Timed out - no response" when they were nearly finished. ... If you mean a workunit (result) status on project web-pages - dont' worry, simply compute it to the end. Duplicate task added to the end of tasks queue and will be sent to other computer after tasks which placed in queue before it. In reality of this bunch of tasks - after several weeks. When your task has been completed, duplicated task will be dropped from queue. And for new tasks deadline was extended to 10 days. |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 19 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,871,753 RAC: 1,481 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thx |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 19 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,871,753 RAC: 1,481 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After one week of waiting, when the remaining time was for a couple of days stalled on 1 day, one of my weak computers would finish one wu in 16 days. The estimated time for this work unit is completely out of reality. And to be honest I would consider splitting this work in smaller chunks because on 1 core Zen 4 it also takes long 54 hours to complete and there is still the issue with wrong calculation of estimated time so it could look like it is stalled for some users. |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 19 Posts: 4 Credit: 2,871,753 RAC: 1,481 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can confirm one workunit number 95792139 is Completed and validated with runtime of 1,305,936.29 second = 15.115 days. |
Send message Joined: 11 Aug 17 Posts: 678 Credit: 25,667,152 RAC: 18,794 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's very limited bunch of tasks - 23664 workunits only. More than 3800 already completed. |
Send message Joined: 17 Mar 19 Posts: 2 Credit: 6,441,300 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Program Spectra of Latin squares 3.03 File name wu_e1074_n12_ls_t_spectrum_loop_all_exps_sq6091_val13514 Status Executing Received 6/5/2025 1:03:30 PM Reporting for 6/15/2025 1:03:32 PM Estimated computation size 500,000 GFLOPs Processor time 1:58:52 PM CPU time since checkpoint 1:58:52 PM Elapsed time 2:01:45 PM Estimated time remaining 3:51:18 AM Progress 91.785% Virtual memory size 73.98 MB Task size 80.64 MB Map slots/20 Process ID 3088 Progress rate 6,480% per hour Executable rake_lsspectra_wrapper_windows_intelx86_64.exe anyone else having this problem keeps dropping back to 92% and that has happened multiple times aborting 10 pieces after 13 hours is a waste continue or take a loss Unfortunately I broke everything down because of 92% to 93 and back to 92 and that followed for 2 hours too much for little greetings |
©2025 The searchers team, Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences